>Frost's intentions with the poem weren't straightforward But, it doesn't tell us what Frost's intent was. I did a Google search and didn't find much. > The m

>Frost's intentions with the poem weren't straightforward But, it doesn't tell us what Frost's intent was. I did a Google search and didn't find much. > The manner in which you dismissed the new way of looking at them indicates that you are more interested in retaining the old meaning. Boy - you make a lot of assumptions. I read Orr's article and disagree with his conclusions. I'm not interested in retaining anything in particular. Frost's intentions with his poem are irrelevant. I read the words and draw a conclusion. If I listen to a piece of music, I'm moved in a particular way irrespective of the composer's intent. >You took it and read it as an attack on, well, what exactly? I think you've implied much more than what I wrote (irony?). My only issue with Orr is that I perceive him to be smug. "The Most Misread Poem in America" is a purposely inflammatory title. Is it really possible to "misread" a poem? Poetry is not non-fiction. It is intended to be subtle and have layers of meaning.