What bothers me in these situations where there is (arguably) room for interpretation over the gravity of the act is the double standards. BigCompany does somet

What bothers me in these situations where there is (arguably) room for interpretation over the gravity of the act is the double standards. BigCompany does something harmless but illegal? They have the resources to make it sound completely benign to a court. Some random person gets hauled to court over an arguably harmless/moral grey zone matter and the story ends much differently.