2 ms·
I suppose it's a difference in terminology, but it seems strange for them to state: > Support for ACID and eventual consistency. As ACID typically implies str
by pipeep 11y ago
I suppose it's a difference in terminology, but it seems strange for them to state:
> Support for ACID and eventual consistency.
As ACID typically implies strong consistency. To quote the wikipedia page on eventual consistency that they link to:
> Eventually consistent services are often classified as providing BASE (Basically Available, Soft state, Eventual consistency) semantics, in contrast to traditional ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) guarantees.
- gkop 11y ago"Support for" implies it's capable of these guarantees independently but doesn't necessarily mean it's capable of both of them simultaneously, IE it may be configured for one or the other.