3 ms·
The best part of this for me was the batch updates. I am a little confused at the need for a user defined type that is a copy of the schema of the table. Woul
by dsugarman 11y ago
The best part of this for me was the batch updates. I am a little confused at the need for a user defined type that is a copy of the schema of the table. Wouldn't it be better to do use:
::table_name%ROWTYPE;
That way you wouldn't need to maintain a table and a type with the exact same schema, no?