3 ms·
I would say it's because non-deterministic things aren't testable, which make them fall out of the bounds of scientific investigation. Obviously that's not rea
by pgwhalen 11y ago
I would say it's because non-deterministic things aren't testable, which make them fall out of the bounds of scientific investigation.
Obviously that's not really true, but it adds a certain level of discomfort to to science.
- FrankenPC 11y agoDiscomfort drives all powerful science.