10 ms·
And your inability to make an argument of any kind has also been duly noted. Did you actually read the RatWiki page? It lists a bunch of cherry picked facts ab
by WorldWideWayne 11y ago
And your inability to make an argument of any kind has also been duly noted.
Did you actually read the RatWiki page? It lists a bunch of cherry picked facts about his views along with some snarky commentary. Wow! Really powerful stuff there.
- DanBC 11y agoI did read the rational Wiki page. It shows Makow has a bunch of beliefs - 911 was a conspiracy; THE JEWS DID IT; etc - that are a strong signal that he isn't worth any more of my time. Again, feel free to point out any particular errors.
- WorldWideWayne 11y agoAnd again - you haven't proven one thing wrong with Henry Makow by simply stating his views and saying that you don't like them. Sorry, but you don't win arguments by saying your opinion over and over. You can think so, but you'd be wrong...again. So the answer is basically: Mu. I don't need to point out errors in RatWiki. I already pointed out your own error - that you're not bringing anything to the table here other than your poorly formulated opinion.