3 ms·
Here I am using `ls -1` for years without realizing the redundancy.
by steckerbrett 11y ago
Here I am using `ls -1` for years without realizing the redundancy.
- akkartik 11y agoYou probably got that into your muscle memory before 'ls' got smarter. I'm sure we all have some habits like that.
- nocman 11y agoDon't feel too bad. I didn't know until reading this that sending the output from ls somewhere other than stdout would cause the output to be one-item-per-line either, and I've been using Unix and Linux platforms for a very long time. If I wanted that behavior, I would have typed 'ls -1' also.