> With Rust, we pulled time out of the standard library before 1.0, specifically because we knew it wasn't up to the task. This honestly strikes me a very good

> With Rust, we pulled time out of the standard library before 1.0, specifically because we knew it wasn't up to the task. This honestly strikes me a very good response. Saddling a still-growing community with sub-par core datatypes is worse than their absence. > So if "no library" counts as a "non-broken" library... Of course if I had phrased my question in terms of the 'first shipped date / time library' then Rust still has a chance to follow this illustrious trajectory for languages (i.e. really mess up). :-)