4 ms·
Bikes can actually be better for people with mobility issues than cars. Biking is pretty low impact and uses less energy than walking, so for some people for wh
by Zach_the_Lizard 11y ago
Bikes can actually be better for people with mobility issues than cars. Biking is pretty low impact and uses less energy than walking, so for some people for whom walking is a challenge, biking might be possible. With safe bike infrastructure, these people can still get around without cars. As a bonus, the exercise will keep them mobile longer.
> There's lots of people like my father, old, handicapped, both, how do you design a mass transit system that can accommodate people like him?
You build an ADA compliant system. Compare the NYC subway, built long before the ADA, and the DC Metro. Except when elevators are broken (a big problem given WMATA's incompetent stewardship of the system), you can use pretty much the entire DC metro system in a wheelchair. Escalators are in every station. In Japan IIRC there were markings in the walkways of train stations, airports, and sidewalks to help the blind navigate, and we could incorporate that in the States.
- bane 11y ago> You build an ADA compliant system. Right, the system can be very easy to get around in, but it's the system to destination legs that can be impossible. This is almost always bridged with some kind of handicapped-accessible bus system in addition to the normal bus system. But then we're back to surface vehicles. Trains can never provide door-to-door service, it's a classic "last mile" problem.