3 ms·
This argument has the same line of reasoning that the businesses originally tried to use when the city did put in buffered bike lines - that removing unfettered
by fowkswe 11y ago
This argument has the same line of reasoning that the businesses originally tried to use when the city did put in buffered bike lines - that removing unfettered automobile / truck access was the death knell to commerce
(Like these: http://gothamist.com/2011/07/14/post_blames_bike_lanes_for_bad_busi.php http://gothamist.com/2011/07/14/post_blames_bike_lanes_for_b... http://www.villagevoice.com/news/new-east-village-bike-lanes-good-for-bikers-bad-for-business-6694622 http://www.villagevoice.com/news/new-east-village-bike-lanes...).
In the case of the bike lanes, this is the furthest from the truth (have a Google for lots of arguments about the merit of increased bike traffic).
I'm not sure what the solution is, but there certainly is one that would support a few car/truck free avenues.
- Strang 11y agoI believe he meant that trucks need access to the business so the business can receive its stock
- nmrm2 11y agoIf this is the concern, then it's a misplaced one, especially for streetcars. It's totally common in European cities for the busiest streets (with shops etc) to be exclusively lanes of recessed rail. Trucks have no problem delivering supplies; in fact, it looked a lot more pleasant than trying to weave in and out of traffic and hope to god loading area parking isn't blocked a la busy streets in US cities...
- fowkswe 11y agoI'm suggesting closing the avenues during the daytime, especially rush hours. Deliveries and garbage pickup can happen early morning or in the evening (which is already the case for garbage pickup).