Which is just a reflection of knee-jerk thinking. This "Evil" corporation pays better than companies that require similar levels of education/commitment and als

Which is just a reflection of knee-jerk thinking. This "Evil" corporation pays better than companies that require similar levels of education/commitment and also offers employees health insurance. However, these benefits are better than those offered by unionized companies and this is a threat to those unions. So you get a smear campaign even though HF nets out as a far better corporate citizen. A lot of my liberal friends were among those angered by the WSJ editorial. Strangely none of them wanted to peer deeper into how this company with a low/no-skill workforce was able to offer insurance benefits. This company should be studied and held up as an example, not pulled into the borg.