3 ms·
This really stinks of something. The author is a bit sensationalist. We are also clearly missing Google's part of the story.
by ethikal 17y ago
This really stinks of something. The author is a bit sensationalist. We are also clearly missing Google's part of the story.
- GoboGobo 17y agoThe author thought to replicate Youtube for a specific audience. First with his own content, that didn't work too well. Luckily enough, Youtube created an API to get specific content. So now the author had the same business model as Youtube, except aimed at a specific part of their audience, and he was using their content, not paying them a dime, and wants to make money off it. The story makes perfect sense. For Google.