If no ISP will host your content, then your message cannot reach anyone, and you effectively have no freedom of expression. I wonder why you oppose government

If no ISP will host your content, then your message cannot reach anyone, and you effectively have no freedom of expression. I wonder why you oppose government censorship, if you applaud private businesses achieving the same effect? Certainly your reasons cant be the same as the post you're replying to[0], and so you're missing their point. [0] in particular Are there ideas so dangerous that they do not deserve to be exposed to public discourse and judged on their merits? I don't think so.