3 ms·
That's a terrible, terrible way to put it. QM is extremely accurate and useful in its own domain. GR is extremely accurate and useful in its own domain. We're
by Florin_Andrei 11y ago
That's a terrible, terrible way to put it. QM is extremely accurate and useful in its own domain. GR is extremely accurate and useful in its own domain.
We're only having problems in those domains where GR meets QM - which happen to be everyday commonplaces such as the inside of black holes, etc.
Let's not taint actual science with armchair kibitzing.
- m_mueller 11y agoLots of SF contains black holes however - for which OPs statement basically applies as you write yourself. Knowing the limits of current science is important I think - especially for SF authors, since this gives them some ways to have fantastical elements (i.e. powering an Alcubierre drive) while staying scientifically acurate.