4 ms·

Does this one have as much lead and cadmium as the previous?

• clamprecht 11y ago
  How much lead & cadmium did the previous one have? (with source please)
  • zorpner 11y ago
    It's easy enough for you to Google up the details. The "issue" wasn't with the content but with their labeling -- they only included the California Prop 65 warning on their website, not on the product packaging (which they claimed was sufficient since the website was the only legitimate source of the product).
    • seiji 11y ago
      It's almost like people entering highly regulated industries should have domain experience and not just make it all up as they go along.
• jeff18 11y ago
  Less: https://faq.soylent.com/hc/en-us/article_attachments/203065059/prop-65-meals.v2.rev_D.jpg https://faq.soylent.com/hc/en-us/article_attachments/2030650...
• deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
• tinco 11y ago
  Probably not. The powdered form (1.5) had protein from brown rice which has higher levels of lead and cadmium. 2.0 gets the protein from soy which has lower levels.
• adultSwim 11y ago
  If that is a genuine concern you have, I suggest monitoring your intake of rice and fish (sorry - don't have a good fish site to link to) http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2012/11/arsenic-in-your-food/index.htm http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2012/11/arsenic-... http://www.consumerreports.org/content/dam/cro/magazine-articles/2012/November/Consumer%20Reports%20Arsenic%20in%20Food%20November%202012_1.pdf http://www.consumerreports.org/content/dam/cro/magazine-arti...