Facts are irrelevant in opinion pieces. Opinions are internally formed truths, which are attempting to make their way into society as a global truth. If you wa

Facts are irrelevant in opinion pieces. Opinions are internally formed truths, which are attempting to make their way into society as a global truth. If you want to point out that the author is bias hacking, fine, but don't move into "fact" mode using weakly biased arguments. You have no evidence that significant numbers of Popcorn Time instances have viruses or malware in them. When you do have that evidence, come back here and state it as such, instead of presenting a hypothesis as a fact as you are currently doing. I would point out that having an opinion about the piece is totally valid. It's just not cool to make a biased argument on your own opinion with "facts" that are simply your own hypotheses.