3 ms·
Hi Mz, Thank you for replying. I take your points on board and share your reservations. However, I certainly wouldn't like to tar every one with the same brus
by gloves 11y ago
Hi Mz,
Thank you for replying. I take your points on board and share your reservations.
However, I certainly wouldn't like to tar every one with the same brush, regardless of their state of home ownership. Although I don't know your personal situation, I would hope you wouldn't wish to inflict harm on someone who opened their home to you. Hopefully this is an example of how the app could work successfully. But you are right, I equally would not wish to be responsible for anyone abusing the app or eachother.
The aim of the app is not to be a hero - it is simply a way to show human emotion to those members of society who are often relegated to sub-human terms and stereotypes. It could be a route to understanding both eachother, and uncovering the root causes of some people's homelessness. As stated in the original description however, the app does treat the symptoms, not the cause, and would therefore not be considered a solution, just temporary respite.
I understand and share your concern, perhaps this would be enough to stop the homeless issue being one I could focus on to begin with.
- Mz 11y agoI am a woman on the street. Most homeless people are male (by a very wide margin). I have had people offer me a place to stay, some of them were men who were clearly expecting me to earn my keep on my back. I turned them down. I am mentioning that only to point out that you are guilty of the prejudice you wish to eradicate: You hope I would not wish to harm someone who opened their home to me. You fail to acknowledge the other half of the equation that I mentioned above: That the person offering me a place to stay might desire to take advantage of me in some way and thereby harm me. Your personal prejudice is a significant obstacle to making this viable. It would bias design towards protecting the people opening their home while giving short shrift to the people needing a temporary place to stay. If you cannot overcome that bias and look very objectively at the problem space of protecting all involved parties, I recommend you abandon the idea, whether for refugees or for anyone else.
- JoeAltmaier 11y agoI sympathize with the problem, and wish for a solution. That said, its not a symmetrical relationship. One party is pressed into the predicament unwillingly: the refugee or homeless person. Their population can be considered uniform i.e. the presence of a predator is no different than in the general population. The folks offering their home as a refuge, volunteer. Their population may be laced with predators, who could find this relationship to be fertile ground for abuse opportunities. This could increase the risk to the refuge-seeker by one or two orders of magnitude. SO the only ones risking anything above meeting any random new person, is the refugee. This is no fault of all the good people who enter this relationship with open heart and open arms. Its just an unfortunate fact of game theory.
- Mz 11y agoI really do not understand what your point is and I fear that it would be a long, long hashing out process to get my point across, one I am not keen to enter into for a variety of reasons, chief of which is that it sounds like you are justifying the bias against homeless and refugees, so this is likely to be an uphill battle that makes me look bad no matter how I handle it. Suffice it to say I stand by the assertion I have already made at least twice: Dealing with security concerns of all involved parties will be a make-or-break detail for such a project. The specific concerns each side has may differ, but you need to look at making sure everyone is equally protected or this has disaster written all over it.
- JoeAltmaier 11y agoI'm afraid I didn't express myself well; I mean just the opposite.
- Mz 11y ago:-) I don't know what to do for the refugees, but if you really want to work on homelessness, you can get involved in some way in helping make affordable housing more available where you live (I am assuming you are American). There is a huge deficit of decent, affordable housing. If it were not in such short supply, there would be fewer Americans on the street. If you can think of no other means to get involved, then support Habitat for Humanity in some way. I also run a couple of websites where I talk about the topic, one aimed at helping homeless individuals, one aimed at putting out good information for those interested in the problem space.
- JoeAltmaier 11y agoYes I understand Habitat is doing very good work. My sister is part of a womens' roofing crew; my nephew is a regional coordinator. And of course Jimmy Carter endorses it, which is really all I need to know!
- 11y ago