This is utter rubbish if it's meant to be taken seriously. I'm not even disagreeing with the assertion that scientists are largely dull. Good science needs a di

This is utter rubbish if it's meant to be taken seriously. I'm not even disagreeing with the assertion that scientists are largely dull. Good science needs a dispassionate and objective attitude, and it's often solitary. I guess those don't make for fertile breeding grounds for what most people find to be interesting in other people. Sadly I believe the author to be serious in his 'analysis' - I'm left shaking my head at the crackpot pretentiousness of it all.