3 ms·
Hi, thanks for taking a look. Could you tell me why this won't work without JS? My motivation to write this is because I always have to go back and make quick
by peterchon 11y ago
Hi, thanks for taking a look. Could you tell me why this won't work without JS?
My motivation to write this is because I always have to go back and make quick margin/padding/etc changes and I hated trying to come up with more class names.
As mentioned, this isn't a framework. It was a way for me to add styles when writing styles to custom directives.
- talmand 11y agoI too don't understand the JS comment. But, if this isn't a framework then it seems rather large. If it were to do only what you describe, simple classes for simple changes, then you are loading in lots of stuff in your inc imports that isn't required. I don't necessarily have a problem with it, it's not a bad idea. Personally I wouldn't be against using something like this that's tailored to a design so that only the necessary classes are required. That way it isn't necessary to have stepping of 1 to 100 on each property.
- peterchon 11y agoThanks, yes I agree it's a lot - but I'm hoping to make something that people can customize so that you don't have 0-100px of choices (but for now, it's an attempt at something new)
- nness 11y agoMy apologies, I noticed a JS folder and comments on the page and assume it was part of the solution. (Seems the timeframe to edit my original comment has expired).