3 ms·
One of the things that gets some of the anti-HFT types going is that it's possible to subscribe to direct exchange data feeds. All exchanges are obliged to con
by __d 11y ago
One of the things that gets some of the anti-HFT types going is that it's possible to subscribe to direct exchange data feeds.
All exchanges are obliged to contribute to the SIP, which offers a market-wide view of quotes (prices) and historical trades. However, because the SIP must aggregate data feeds from all exchanges and then republish this information, it's possible to "predict the future" if you subscribe to the direct exchanges feeds (which are more-or-less what they send to the SIP) and avoid the added latency of a hop via the SIP's aggregator and redistribution.
These direct exchange feeds are expensive, and getting more so (ie. NYSE UltraBook is $11,000/month for the data, plus port fees, plus connectivity). The argument is that this segments the customers such that unfair advantage is available to those who can afford to subscribe to the direct feeds.
More recently (last two? years) it's been possible to get a microwave transmission of the data, rather than fiber, which is both lower-latency and more expensive again.
- vasilipupkin 11y agoDirect feeds are available to all market participants. Expensive really sounds like an excuse. It costs what it costs, it's not clear why it should cost any less than it does.
- __d 11y agoRight. If a direct feed is too expensive, then a SIP feed being more than the end-of-day prices in the newspaper could fall foul of the same argument.