4 ms·
Not necessarily for the Outlook users. The default setting of my Outlook was to ignore double line breaks and (paragraphs), which makes plain text mails less re
by qw 11y ago
Not necessarily for the Outlook users. The default setting of my Outlook was to ignore double line breaks and (paragraphs), which makes plain text mails less readable.
- smcl 11y agoSame for me, I cannot think of the use case for this - maybe it was introduced in the embrace/extend/extinguish era to nudge people into using Rich Text format emails?
- smcl 11y agoSame for me, I cannot think of the use case for this - maybe it was introduced in the embrace/extend/extinguish era to nudge people into using Rich Text format emails?
- insertnickname 11y agoIt is Outlook that is gross.
- monochromatic 11y agoUnfortunately, sometimes in the real world we don't all get to always choose our own tools.
- insertnickname 11y agoSure, but you still shouldn't blame plain text for Outlook's failures.
- monochromatic 11y agoI didn't lay blame at all. I just asked: "Do you wind up with plaintext emails that look gross when opened in Outlook?" My presumption, based on your defensiveness/evasiveness, is that the answer is "yes."