6 ms·
The "full stack" listed in the article was missing growing the silicon and screwing the servers to the rack. Seriously, the list of what the author considers "
by loph 11y ago
The "full stack" listed in the article was missing growing the silicon and screwing the servers to the rack. Seriously, the list of what the author considers "full stack" was extreme. Otherwise, I know a lot of people (including myself) who can build you a high-performance web-app from scratch, using current tech and what I consider to be a "full stack" (most of what is mentioned in the article).
The author just cannot afford to pay them. Because that kind of skill comes at a high price. And that's where the bitching starts -- you cannot find a competent, capable "full-stack" developer who wants to work for chump change. People with those skills know what they are worth, and expect to get paid.
- herval 11y agoin my experience (both hiring & getting hired), super-specialists are way more expensive than full-stacks. YMMV, of course.
- arenaninja 11y ago> The "full stack" listed in the article was missing growing the silicon and screwing the servers to the rack This is funny, but I actually know a guy whose last full-stack job entitled just that in addition to his dev duties! Since they self-hosted, he was responsible for data redundancy, etc. The guy's experience was definitely impressive