3 ms·
I don't use mutt anymore, but I still feel it's a beautiful client, both in its simplicity and its appearance (take the screenshot from the article, for example
by morganvachon 11y ago
I don't use mutt anymore, but I still feel it's a beautiful client, both in its simplicity and its appearance (take the screenshot from the article, for example). I probably should start using it again since I'm transitioning away from Gmail to a traditional mail host.
- icebraining 11y agoI use Alpine instead; tried mutt first, but found it abstruse to set up.
- raverbashing 11y agoYeah, I'm biased towards (Al)pine, would be interesting to know how does Mutt compares with it
- eru 11y agoI started with Pine, and used mutt for a bit later. Mutt is ok, if you invest the time in learning it. (If you can handle vim, you can cope with mutt.)
- twic 11y agoInteresting. I've been using (al)pine for years, and there are bits of it which really frustrate me - mostly how slow it is when dealing with large mailboxes - so i have been considering a move to mutt for a while. I'm not a vim fan, so i might have to reconsider!
- eru 11y agoOh, the specific keystrokes etc are not the same. (I don't think they even have the concept of modes in mutt.) It's more of a spiritual similarity. About as faint as vim / nethack.