8 ms·
bluehost has worked for me quite well although it's not really the cheapest option.
by saganus 11y ago
bluehost has worked for me quite well although it's not really the cheapest option.
- imaginenore 11y agoFuck bluehost. https://www.reddit.com/r/photography/comments/3jdwzc/bluehost_just_suspended_my_account_for_seeming_to/ https://www.reddit.com/r/photography/comments/3jdwzc/bluehos...
- saganus 11y agoI guess it would be nice if someone could suggest a registrar that has absolutely zero complains. Like I said, it has worked for me. I didn't say they were perfect. Please show me what domain registrar do you use that you would recommend, and then let's see if there aren't any horror stories whatsoever.
- thaumaturgy 11y agoYou have a point, every time there's a recommendations thread someone comes along to crap on the most popular recommendation (I'm guilty of that too). I've had to work with a pretty large number of different registrars and hosting companies over the years -- part and parcel of being a troubleshooter -- and I'd place Bluehost squarely in the middle of the pack. They've never done anything infuriating, which puts them way ahead of a lot of other companies, but there's also not really anything about them that sets them apart from the rest of their competition, other than maybe their size.