3 ms·
I don't think they would for me. My Dell u2412m has a pixel density of 94 PPI (I think?) which is quite low for today's standards but it does the job and I can
by TurboHaskal 11y ago
I don't think they would for me.
My Dell u2412m has a pixel density of 94 PPI (I think?) which is quite low for today's standards but it does the job and I can't justify upgrading it. Compare this to my current smartphone (xperia z3 compact) which at 720p has 319 PPI and is still considered low end in this regard.
Work provided me with a macbook pro retina and I don't see what's the fuss about. Hence running mostly on clam-shell mode.
On older notebooks I simply use the Dina font which looks great on low res screns.
Of course when I go to the stores and see these 4k TVs I definitely notice a difference but we're not talking media consumption here.
I feel the same about 21:9 aspect ratios or multi monitor setups. My favorites are still 4:3 or 16:10. I used to have a multi monitor setup for a while but ended up selling it.
I might have to get my eyes looked at, or maybe I spent too much time staring at mainframe screens.