3 ms·
> Speeding up a dog 1000x doesn't generate a dangerous AI. I would be scared of a dog that could think and move 1000x faster. Would it not see a human as a (pr
by insoluble 11y ago
> Speeding up a dog 1000x doesn't generate a dangerous AI.
I would be scared of a dog that could think and move 1000x faster. Would it not see a human as a (practically) non-moving piece of meat? That does not sound very safe.
> It's easy to see how a "wider" intelligence could be much more productive, more creative, more useful, and more dangerous than any meat brain in existence.
It seems to me one of the most dangerous things in existence is ignorance. If a machine had less ignorance, then in theory it should be less dangerous.