For my > The police stopped the car because the driver failed to use a turn signal? I was too brief: If the police stop someone for a turn signal violation,

For my > The police stopped the car because the driver failed to use a turn signal? I was too brief: If the police stop someone for a turn signal violation, okay, charge them with the turn signal violation. But if charge the person with, say, some more serious crime, then have to suspect that the turn signal issue was false and just used as a means of unconstitutional unreasonable search. My experience is that a good way to suffer an unconstitutional search from, say, a turn signal violation is just to drive an old car in a poor neighborhood, or really, any neighborhood, late at night, etc. Police just like to stop and search cars, for any reason or no reason, and will use any excuse as a way to do that. In my case, after the stop, I'm articulate, calm, mature, and get away with it. But still I get stopped due to the violation of driving with an old car. For my > A police officer killed an unarmed person? Deliberate, unprovoked, unexcusable murder. Life or the chair. The burden of proof would have to be strongly on the side of the police to prove that they had no alternative to being seriously injured or killed themselves. For the police to say "I felt that my life was threatened" is not nearly enough. In such a confrontation with an unarmed person, the police have enormous advantages in force -- radios, backup, cameras to identify the person in case they run, clubs, guns, bullet proof vests, etc. For a person to die looks really bad. We've had at least one recent case where the person was running away, was over 10 feet away, and the police shot them in the back and killed them just to keep them from running away. At present, apparently the real standard is that a person has to obey every command of an officer, be pleasant, object to nothing, defend themselves against nothing, hand over money and personal belongings that they may never get back, not make a recording, not call 911, permit any search, accept painful restraints, not try to run away, be verbally insulted, be sexually molested, etc. or the officer can just shoot and kill the person and get away with it. One response I have would be what I would do on jury duty. But, right, likely a public prosecutor would never let me on a jury. Another alternative is to have my startup work, get rich, be careful, and set up some funding for some essentially sting operations to catch police misbehaving, where there was overwhelming evidence from hidden cameras and microphones, long distance cameras, etc. that the police did something wrong. Then have the legal resources to prosecute the police. Use such actions as examples, and then try to get some better behavior from the police. E.g., civil forfeiture, that is, the crime of carrying too much cash, that is, legalized highway robbery. I can't feel guilty for sticking up for our Constitution.