What I missed both in the article and in the consensus that "you personally attacked and offended teachers", is drawing the important distinction between author

What I missed both in the article and in the consensus that "you personally attacked and offended teachers", is drawing the important distinction between authoring those comments, and merely publishing them. Also, the issue of whether they were subjective but essentially honest, clearly humorous, or malicious fabrications. In any case, I do not think that taking a personal offence is at all an appropriate reaction to someone merely facilitating an anonymous survey.