4 ms·
Nats is really neat, and super simple to deploy. For many use cases, the lack of persistence might be a showstopper, though.
by jedisct1 11y ago
Nats is really neat, and super simple to deploy.
For many use cases, the lack of persistence might be a showstopper, though.
- bjflanne 11y agoHi guys I'm on the Community/Ecosystem side of NATS...timely comment. Persistence is actually on the roadmap but we only just discussed end of August at our Bay Area meetup:https://youtu.be/jxpYszUi8JQ https://youtu.be/jxpYszUi8JQ Please feel free to ping me with further questions, comments, ideas etc if you'd like to chat further: brian@apcera.com
- bjflanne 11y agoAlso, I should add we've made some significant updates since the article you referenced, and are currently performing additional benchmarking, but some examples: https://twitter.com/derekcollison/status/635541819393245184 https://twitter.com/derekcollison/status/635541819393245184 It would be helpful to understand what you are trying to achieve, and what characteristics in messaging infrastructure are most important to you?