3 ms·
Makes more sense if you include the full context, why are you manufacturing outrage? " What that means is the problem is 10 years upstream of us. If we really
by ps4fanboy 11y ago
Makes more sense if you include the full context, why are you manufacturing outrage?
"
What that means is the problem is 10 years upstream of us. If we really wanted to fix this problem, what we would have to do is not encourage women to start startups now.
It's already too late. What we should be doing is somehow changing the middle school computer science curriculum or something like that. God knows what you would do to get 13 year old girls interested in computers. I would have to stop and think about that.
"
- kjs3 11y agoHow does your context not engender outrage? It's nothing more than "the boys, they'll be fine because boys are better than girls at technology and we're totally cool if they go on to start companies. But the girls, well, they're inferior so why would we encourage them." But I'm sure you'll get props at your mens rights movement meeting for pretending overt "girls just aren't good at tech" messaging isn't sexism.
- 59nadir 11y agoIt's very simple; he's saying the problem goes back to elementary school. You need to plant the seed then to foster any meaningful amount of interest and engagement in computers and computer science. Since this is currently only really succeeding with boys, you need to re-examine what's being done and make sure that the seed is also planted for girls. The boys will be fine because clearly what's being done is already working for them, but as a group girls are clearly not being drawn into computer science education and so that's where the problem lies.