3 ms·
Sociology is full of chaotic systems, so slight deviations in the premises can have wide effects on the outcome of the system you are describing. I would repla
by x3n0ph3n3 11y ago
Sociology is full of chaotic systems, so slight deviations in the premises can have wide effects on the outcome of the system you are describing.
I would replace your cow analogy with a 2-pendulum analogy. Depending on the nuances of what is being observed, a small change in the inputs of your system can create dramatically different behaviors. It's important to account for how you define your initial conditions and variables so that you don't end up with a model that matches early in a simulation but ultimately diverges into something that looks nothing like what can be observed in the world.
- karmakaze 11y agoI don't buy the 2-pendulum analogy. Nuance, as I read in the article, is about detection of ever decreasing observed quantities ad nauseam. It would be fine-grained discussion of the non-chaotic ranges of said pendulum. Basically a pissing contest, which is as good as any, but still just that. Once it goes beyond any practical use, has no more value.