4 ms·

The earth is really good at blocking radio waves; the beacon is only going to be good when it shows up again in water open to the sky. Similarly, it may be tha

by vacri 11y ago

The earth is really good at blocking radio waves; the beacon is only going to be good when it shows up again in water open to the sky. Similarly, it may be that the water is getting to Lake Superior just fine, but that the path it takes has plenty of opportunity to get debris caught up or lost in a side-channel.

rmason 11y ago
A ping pong ball or dye isn't going to work if it is surfacing in Lake Superior. That lake is so vast that the kind of a tracker they use in airplane black boxes is a good bet. Short of mapping the lake bottom, which is unrealistic, we may never solve the mystery.
- steckerbrett 11y ago
  A radioisotope might work, though good luck convincing people to dump tonnes of radioactive marker into a hole that nobody knows where it goes. A pinger from an aeroplane would do an alright job, but they are usually specified to work for a week which might be far longer than the period underwater.
- toyg 11y ago
  > Short of mapping the lake bottom, which is unrealistic Is it? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/archaeology/11836627/British-Atlantis-archaeologists-begin-exploring-lost-world-of-Doggerland.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/archaeolog... Granted, these guys seem to be piggybacking on massive work done by oil companies, but the North Sea is roughly 3x Lake Superior, so you only need 1/3 of the effort. You just have to find an excuse...
- Animats 11y ago
  The US Navy has been quietly mapping ocean bottoms for decades, since nuclear submarines started going all over the oceans.[1] The resolution isn't all that great, but by now they know where most of the seamounts are. It's a boring job. Cruise across ocean in a straight line towing a sonar array, return along a parallel track, repeat. But maybe nobody has bothered to do the Great Lakes in detail yet. Not much submarine traffic. [1] http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorations/lewis_clark01/background/seafloormapping/seafloormapping.html http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorations/lewis_clark01/bac...

by vacri 11y ago

rmason 11y ago

A ping pong ball or dye isn't going to work if it is surfacing in Lake Superior. That lake is so vast that the kind of a tracker they use in airplane black boxes is a good bet. Short of mapping the lake bottom, which is unrealistic, we may never solve the mystery.

steckerbrett 11y ago
A radioisotope might work, though good luck convincing people to dump tonnes of radioactive marker into a hole that nobody knows where it goes. A pinger from an aeroplane would do an alright job, but they are usually specified to work for a week which might be far longer than the period underwater.
toyg 11y ago
> Short of mapping the lake bottom, which is unrealistic Is it? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/archaeology/11836627/British-Atlantis-archaeologists-begin-exploring-lost-world-of-Doggerland.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/archaeolog... Granted, these guys seem to be piggybacking on massive work done by oil companies, but the North Sea is roughly 3x Lake Superior, so you only need 1/3 of the effort. You just have to find an excuse...
Animats 11y ago
The US Navy has been quietly mapping ocean bottoms for decades, since nuclear submarines started going all over the oceans.[1] The resolution isn't all that great, but by now they know where most of the seamounts are. It's a boring job. Cruise across ocean in a straight line towing a sonar array, return along a parallel track, repeat. But maybe nobody has bothered to do the Great Lakes in detail yet. Not much submarine traffic. [1] http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorations/lewis_clark01/background/seafloormapping/seafloormapping.html http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorations/lewis_clark01/bac...