3 ms·
Does this allow for installation of add-ons?
by monochromatic 11y ago
Does this allow for installation of add-ons?
- st3fan 11y agoWhat kind of add-ons would you like to see?
- anonymousab 11y agoPresumably any add-on supported by Firefox on Android.
- zobzu 11y agoerm.. ublock :)
- ronjouch 11y agouBlock too. Or maybe it would be possible to use the upcoming iOS 9 content-blocking extensions [1], or is it a feature/api usable to Safari only? [1] https://developer.apple.com/library/prerelease/ios/releasenotes/General/WhatsNewInSafari/Articles/Safari_9.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40014305-CH9-SW8 https://developer.apple.com/library/prerelease/ios/releaseno...
- ascagnel_ 11y agoThe newer web view (WKWebView) will support content blocking extensions across all apps. The older web view (UIWebView) will not support content blocking at all
- elktea 11y agoLastpass, Privacy Badger, Disconnect and uBlock
- Blaaguuu 11y agoI imagine that would be in violation of Apple's rules around apps executing 'arbitrary' code from 3rd party sources.
- blazespin 11y agoHmm, well firefox could vet them so that they're not 3rd party and the user could permit to inject 'add ons' into every web page loaded. You are allowed to upload html/javascript dynamically (just not shared objects, jvm byte code, etc)
- kristopolous 11y agothat's such a silly restriction here. Nearly every webpage a user goes to breaks that rule.
- interpol_p 11y agoThat depends on whether the code is executed using Apple's JavaScriptCore framework, or your own interpreter. It's a stupid rule, but you can execute arbitrary code if you create a JSContext and load it in your app.