Seems like a similar thing in quorums of agents playing lots of rounds of The Prisoner's Dilemma. Where Tit-for-tat is the optimal strategy in one on one. But w

Seems like a similar thing in quorums of agents playing lots of rounds of The Prisoner's Dilemma. Where Tit-for-tat is the optimal strategy in one on one. But when you have groups of agents that can communicate before rounds and coordinate defaulting instead of cooperating the groups as a whole can score better than tit-for-tat.