3 ms·
Whatever. Unfortunately, in doing so you have used the "AI is analogous to heavier-than-air-flight" meme. Please discard it, it's an albatross to discussion. O
by giardini 11y ago
Whatever.
Unfortunately, in doing so you have used the "AI is analogous to heavier-than-air-flight" meme. Please discard it, it's an albatross to discussion. Or to be more precise, it is a lead balloon - it never gets off the ground; it's a red herring. IOW you've chosen a poor and annoyingly wrongheaded counterexample. Now try and digest that.
- Nevermark 11y agoIf you use an argument and someone provides a single counter example, then your argument is false. That's it. You can continue arguing your conclusion or view, but you need to find another argument to support it. The fact that humans could invent super-flight despite not being able to build a bird means that the argument that we cannot build a super intelligent machine because we don't yet know how to make ourselves biologically more intelligent, is not a good argument.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]