9 ms·
Have they done any long-term studies on smoking pot vs. vaping vs. edibles?
by amwelles 11y ago
Have they done any long-term studies on smoking pot vs. vaping vs. edibles?
- hellbanner 11y agoI'm not aware of any, but edibles certainly won't cause lung damage.
- nickff 11y agoThough they may cause stomach and/or intestinal damage.
- duaneb 11y agoPeople have been ingesting cannabis since long, long, long before they smoked it from a pipe. It would surprise me if there are dire health effects that are entirely undiscovered. This is, of course, shitty compared to actually providing a study.
- vezzy-fnord 11y agoPeople have been ingesting cannabis since long, long, long before they smoked it from a pipe. It would surprise me if there are dire health effects that are entirely undiscovered. The same held true for tobacco for quite a long time, do keep in mind.
- duaneb 11y agoAre there poor health effects from ingesting tabacco? it makes my stomach turn, but I wouldn't jump to cancer.
- nickff 11y agoYes, according to a number of sources.[1][2] [1] http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/quit-smoking/in-depth/chewing-tobacco/art-20047428?pg=2 http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/quit-smoking/in-... [2] http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/tobaccocancer/smokeless-tobacco http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/tobaccocancer/smok...
- duaneb 11y agoNice find. The likely carcinogens in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco-specific_nitrosamines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco-specific_nitrosamines
- DanBC 11y agoYes. In fact, there are also problems for smkers who cough up and then swallow phlegm - this increases risk of bladder and penile cancers.
- comrh 11y agoStomach, esophagus, and pancreas cancers are all common for people who dip. The chemical difference between smokeless tobacco and marijuana in food is probably a lot different though.
- gnaritas 11y agoNo, not any more than eating any other food; it's a plant, it isn't going to hurt your stomach.
- Amezarak 11y ago> No, not any more than eating any other food; it's a plant, it isn't going to hurt your stomach. There are plenty of plants that can hurt your stomach a great deal. Some will even kill you. "It's a plant" is not an argument.
- gnaritas 11y agoIt's not a poisonousness plant.
- dictum 11y ago>it's a plant, it isn't going to hurt your stomach Let me be hyperpedantic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_poisonous_plants https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_poisonous_plants
- gnaritas 11y agoIt's not a poisonousness plant.
- hellbanner 11y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabinoid_hyperemesis_syndrome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabinoid_hyperemesis_syndro...
- duaneb 11y agoWell, if you're not breathing in tar, heavy metals, free radicals, etc., it's not hard to come out on top over smoking.
- johnward 11y agoThere still has to be some damage from smoke inhalation, no? Then I'm curious about smoking vs "vaping" vs oil etc. Anecdotally I see a lot of old hippies still kicking. edit: I didn't realize you were pointing out the effect of smoking cannabis.
- duaneb 11y agoSorry, that WAS the damage from smoke inhalation. Theoretically if you're vaping or eating you shouldn't be combusting anything and should get 0 smoke. And yes, you can get lung/throat cancer from inhaling pot smoke. Probably way worse than from a cigarette because there's no filter (THC is super sticky, so it's kind of counter productive).
- joesmo 11y agoThis is a myth. Smoking marijuana might actually be negatively correlated with lung cancer for long term users. Regardless, it's certainly not associated with increased lung cancer or increased risk for COPD. You and others who are misinformed should stop spreading around these ridiculous lies and look at the science: "Although marijuana smoke contains a number of carcinogens and cocarcinogens, findings from a limited number of well-designed epidemiological studies do not suggest an increased risk for the development of either lung or upper airway cancer from light or moderate use, although evidence is mixed concerning possible carcinogenic risks of heavy, long-term use." -- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23802821 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23802821
- duaneb 11y agoIt is far and away irrisponsible to call a health effect a myth because one paper suggests an opposite effect for light to moderate users. Considering we DO know what we are inhaling, and we DO know it causes massive problems for other smoked substances, it is rational to think that there are likely related effects. Until we can identify that these effects are NOT occurring, we should definitely assume that you can get lung cancer by inhaling massive amounts of carcinogens.