5 ms·
From the abstract of the Nature article linked by @comboy below (http://www.nature.com/articles/srep12488 http://www.nature.com/articles/srep12488): > the mag
by kenbellows 11y ago
From the abstract of the Nature article linked by @comboy below (http://www.nature.com/articles/srep12488 http://www.nature.com/articles/srep12488):
> the magnetic field from a source at one end of the wormhole appears at the other end as an isolated magnetic monopolar field, creating the illusion of a magnetic field propagating through a tunnel outside the 3D space.
Seems that there's no actual tunneling, just the illusion of tunneling.
- lvs 11y agoThe article is in the journal Scientific Reports, not Nature. Nature Publishing Group is the publisher of that journal.
- semi-extrinsic 11y agoAlso, note that Scientific Reports has no requirements for a paper to be super-novel/cool/hot topic, in contrast to the actual Nature journal. Anything which is decent science will get published in SRep; it's NPG's version of PLOS One. It seems Nature's strategy is working here, since many news outlets and the general public don't seem to be aware of the difference.