I guess the counter example to that might be 4chan. It's difficult _to_ be recognized on 4chan, if at all. Obviously it has its "ghetto" parts (weird term, I d

I guess the counter example to that might be 4chan. It's difficult _to_ be recognized on 4chan, if at all. Obviously it has its "ghetto" parts (weird term, I don't fully get it) but it still manages to be a successful (and I would argue quite influential) site 10 years on. Would you say the true name policy has assisted in them getting bigger too? Or just stopped them from getting "ghetto"?