3 ms·
You played or someone broke your legs or burned down your house. Last time I checked, no state is doing anything like that. I think that the major difference
by eveningcoffee 11y ago
You played or someone broke your legs or burned down your house. Last time I checked, no state is doing anything like that.
I think that the major difference comes from the magnitude of the power.
You are describing two possible measures: reducing somebodies mobility and destroying financial situation.
State can in both situations be a lot of more effective and therefore offer better competition against the mafia.
If a State wants to reduce somebodies mobility, it will arrest this person. In many cases this can be extended to eternity.
A state can be also more efficient in the second case - instead of burning down the house, state can just confiscate it.
- fredkbloggs 11y agoYes but can you provide a single instance in which the state did any of those things because someone chose not to play the lottery? I'm usually the first guy ranting about excessive state power. I won't be hard to convince. Convince me.