3 ms·
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuttle_Down https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuttle_Down . The upgrade of the runway to support the Shuttle started in May 1986 (h
by dalke 11y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuttle_Down https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuttle_Down .
The upgrade of the runway to support the Shuttle started in May 1986 (https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2245&dat=19860423&id=bn0zAAAAIBAJ&sjid=aTIHAAAAIBAJ&pg=6565,6718694&hl=en https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2245&dat=19860423&id=... ) and ended by August 1987 (https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=860&dat=19870817&id=YPNYAAAAIBAJ&sjid=H48DAAAAIBAJ&pg=4240,4618788&hl=en https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=860&dat=19870817&id=Y... ).
- toomuchtodo 11y ago"In addition, astronauts now carry passports and other documents, including traveller's cheques, in case of emergency landings."
- mightybyte 11y agoGiven the high cost of every pound when launching things into space this seems at first glance to be a pretty lousy idea. It seems to me solving this problem through diplomatic channels would be a much better plan given the fairly low probability of this event.
- idlewords 11y agoThe problem has been even more economically solved by cancelling the shuttle
- mikeash 11y agoSpace shuttle cargo was something like $20,000/pound. If each astronaut needs a pound of paperwork for contingencies (which seems like a vast overestimate) then that's $20,000 each, which is tiny. And the marginal cost per pound was small. Given that you're doing a launch anyway, you're probably not exactly at the mass limit, so a few extra pounds of paperwork costs almost nothing.
- dalke 11y agoNote the '[citation needed]' - I think that text comes from the publisher's comments in the book. If so, well, publishers aren't known to be scrupulously honest.