4 ms·

This particular variation was (finally!) fixed in the 2013 POSIX revision: "If either of the files dot or dot-dot are specified as the basename portion of an o

by pdw 11y ago

This particular variation was (finally!) fixed in the 2013 POSIX revision: "If either of the files dot or dot-dot are specified as the basename portion of an operand (that is, the final pathname component) or if an operand resolves to the root directory, rm shall write a diagnostic message to standard error and do nothing more with such operands." http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/rm.html http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/rm... Warning: not yet widely implemented outside the GNU world.

TheLoneWolfling 11y ago
Personally, I wish two things: 1) that rm had a (configurable) number of files / directories above which it'll ask you to double-check. 2) that files had a "pleasedontdelete" flag that rm would check and ask about.
- Zenst 11y ago
  You can script that all up and call it rm and pop it higher up the user PATH and if you need the pure rm command without the wrapper protection (for say scripts) then can just point to that with the full path.
- derefr 11y ago
  > pleasedontdelete flag For some programs (rm isn't one of them), removing the write permission is sufficient to get an interactive prompt when you try to overwrite/truncate/delete the file. I really like OSX's current metaphor, where files that haven't been touched in a while get "locked", and must then be "unlocked" to modify them further. Phrasing it in terms of stability rather than permission makes a lot of sense to me. It's too bad the metaphor isn't echoed in the CLI.
  - alcari 11y ago
    `rm` is definitely one of them, it's just suppressed by the `-f` flag. (examples from Ubuntu) $ touch foo $ chmod -w foo $ rm foo rm: remove write-protected regular empty file ‘foo’? There's also the immutable attribute many modern filesystems support, which prevents the file from being modified unless the attribute is removed. $ sudo chattr +i foo $ rm foo rm: remove write-protected regular empty file ‘foo’? y rm: cannot remove ‘foo’: Operation not permitted
  - ethbro 11y ago
    That's a surprisingly good idea for UAC too. People would hate that it's non-deterministic (from "how will my program run on a user's system" perspective), but makes more sense than other approaches. If I'm tapping a file that's been sitting there since the OS was installed and hasn't been touched since... Probably fair to ask me to confirm!
- JoshTriplett 11y ago
  > 1) that rm had a (configurable) number of files / directories above which it'll ask you to double-check. Install safe-rm; it does exactly that.
bronson 11y ago
No protection for `rm -rf file.bak ~`? I'd love to know whoever it was that thought tilde was a good character to use in backup filenames.

by pdw 11y ago

TheLoneWolfling 11y ago

Personally, I wish two things: 1) that rm had a (configurable) number of files / directories above which it'll ask you to double-check. 2) that files had a "pleasedontdelete" flag that rm would check and ask about.

Zenst 11y ago
You can script that all up and call it rm and pop it higher up the user PATH and if you need the pure rm command without the wrapper protection (for say scripts) then can just point to that with the full path.
derefr 11y ago
> pleasedontdelete flag For some programs (rm isn't one of them), removing the write permission is sufficient to get an interactive prompt when you try to overwrite/truncate/delete the file. I really like OSX's current metaphor, where files that haven't been touched in a while get "locked", and must then be "unlocked" to modify them further. Phrasing it in terms of stability rather than permission makes a lot of sense to me. It's too bad the metaphor isn't echoed in the CLI.
- alcari 11y ago
  `rm` is definitely one of them, it's just suppressed by the `-f` flag. (examples from Ubuntu) $ touch foo $ chmod -w foo $ rm foo rm: remove write-protected regular empty file ‘foo’? There's also the immutable attribute many modern filesystems support, which prevents the file from being modified unless the attribute is removed. $ sudo chattr +i foo $ rm foo rm: remove write-protected regular empty file ‘foo’? y rm: cannot remove ‘foo’: Operation not permitted
- ethbro 11y ago
  That's a surprisingly good idea for UAC too. People would hate that it's non-deterministic (from "how will my program run on a user's system" perspective), but makes more sense than other approaches. If I'm tapping a file that's been sitting there since the OS was installed and hasn't been touched since... Probably fair to ask me to confirm!
JoshTriplett 11y ago
> 1) that rm had a (configurable) number of files / directories above which it'll ask you to double-check. Install safe-rm; it does exactly that.

bronson 11y ago

No protection for `rm -rf file.bak ~`? I'd love to know whoever it was that thought tilde was a good character to use in backup filenames.