3 ms·
Part of the thought was to also reduce transport cost. So if you have effectively the harvest and distribution localized one would reduce footprint in other wa
by ironchef 11y ago
Part of the thought was to also reduce transport cost. So if you have effectively the harvest and distribution localized one would reduce footprint in other ways.
That being said I'm not saying "expensive urban rooftops" are where we should be doing this. I was simply suggesting there are other changes afoot that are, for example, increasing yield. Any location will have pros on cons such as locality, cost, infrastructure, space reuse, etc.
- evgen 11y agoTransport costs (in $ and CO2) are a rounding error compared to the cost of other inputs in food production.