4 ms·
I saw that, and was 50-50 if he was referencing JFK Jr. explicitly. On one hand, Greenspun is a pretty noted Libertarian and not a fan of the Kennedys. On the
by JimmyL 17y ago
I saw that, and was 50-50 if he was referencing JFK Jr. explicitly.
On one hand, Greenspun is a pretty noted Libertarian and not a fan of the Kennedys. On the other, he often references flying to Martha's Vineyard for day trips in his other writings about aviation, and it seems like a pretty sensible place to fly to if you're into civil aviation and looking for a day flight somewhere from Boston (where I believe he's based).
- gwern 17y agoI'd agree; from reading his blog for a long time, he is in fact based out of Boston, spends a lot of time engaged in small-scale civil aviation, and does visit Martha's Vineyard more frequently than your average bear. (Check out http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2009/08/15/complete-marthas-vineyard-vacation-in-one-afternoon/ http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2009/08/15/complete-marth... ). Nothing says it can't be both - it's a location that naturally comes to his mind, his point is valid (weather conditions can be dangerous there, Kennedys aside), and it happens to be a dig at some people he hates. Packing that much into a short phrase is called good polemic writing, people.
- aaronsw 17y agoI'm friends with Philip and I doubt he'd consider himself a libertarian. He's more of a _Slate_-style counterintuitivist, although he'd probably object to any kind of political label.