3 ms·
Hi, for node-only usage, how is this different from Racer[0] (part of DerbyJS)? [0]: https://github.com/derbyjs/racer https://github.com/derbyjs/racer
by oDot 11y ago
Hi, for node-only usage, how is this different from Racer[0] (part of DerbyJS)?
[0]: https://github.com/derbyjs/racer https://github.com/derbyjs/racer
- gawry 11y agoThey make a comparison in their Docs. http://docs.telepat.io/#comparison http://docs.telepat.io/#comparison
- oDot 11y agoThanks! EDIT: looks like the comparison is Derby only - racer is a bit more flexible IMO
- gabidobocan 11y agoRacer is great at synchronizing objects, and more flexible than Derby. One key difference between Racer and Telepat is that the Racer client needs to run within a JS container, while Telepat offloads native functionality to native clients. I'd say we're more mobile and user-access oriented than Racer, basically, but we're more architecturally apart as well.