3 ms·
I can't approve of that attitude. Why not? Most companies that end up with that kind of hardcore legacy code a) refuse to upgrade on a reasonable basis and b)
by angersock 11y ago
I can't approve of that attitude.
Why not?
Most companies that end up with that kind of hardcore legacy code a) refuse to upgrade on a reasonable basis and b) refuse to compensate their developers in proportion to the value they ultimately deliver.
So, fuck'em. Might as well enjoy the pseudo pension.
- nostalgiac 11y agoI agree. If the company has pidgeon holed themselves into the situation, they clearly have the 2 options you stated, and that should not reflect poorly on the original author.
- prawn 11y agoThis is in health/medical and the employee in question is nearing retirement. I'd like to think that he should be encouraging them to consider a succession plan ahead of time to minimise risk for the thousands of people likely to be effected by this. There's a good chance, from my understanding of the situation, that his managers don't understand the situation as well as he does. I think he should think bigger than himself. Management's decisions are unlikely to be budget related.