4 ms·
Your claim was that a favicon could be a different font than in the logo. But these examples are all a part of the logos. Google would have needed to rebrand th
by hanspeter 11y ago
Your claim was that a favicon could be a different font than in the logo. But these examples are all a part of the logos. Google would have needed to rebrand their logo to do the same.
- raldi 11y agoThe claim was, "Using a different font [on your favicon than the one you use in your wordmark] would make absolutely no sense." I believe I have successfully refuted that claim.