3 ms·
But all three logos were designed and introduced at the same time as their corresponding favicon. Your claim was that the favicon was just a copy of an existing
by raldi 11y ago
But all three logos were designed and introduced at the same time as their corresponding favicon. Your claim was that the favicon was just a copy of an existing part of the logo.
- hanspeter 11y agoYour claim was that a favicon could be a different font than in the logo. But these examples are all a part of the logos. Google would have needed to rebrand their logo to do the same.
- raldi 11y agoThe claim was, "Using a different font [on your favicon than the one you use in your wordmark] would make absolutely no sense." I believe I have successfully refuted that claim.