The article says: The "list" is reportedly the product of a Q4 project in which all group heads were asked to look at redundancies and create their own lists of

The article says: The "list" is reportedly the product of a Q4 project in which all group heads were asked to look at redundancies and create their own lists of potential cuts. All the group-level lists have now been turned in to corporate. There is a lot of dead wood, and even more VP level employees that really don't contribute to the bottom line. It doesn't sound like this is how you get rid of VP-level dead wood, or am I wrong?