The article's assertion is simply that people with a safety net have a reduced risk. Marginal reduction in risk increases entrepreneurship. There's probably al

The article's assertion is simply that people with a safety net have a reduced risk. Marginal reduction in risk increases entrepreneurship. There's probably also a marginal reduction in reward, as the reward of entrepreneurial success for the poverty-stricken would include safe housing, food, education for children, etc., which the wealthy already have, but it seems we have no problems desiring to spend more than we currently have.