Most on the right would not, IME, support the position that freedom cannot be restricted based on past conviction of a crime. As someone on the right, one issu

Most on the right would not, IME, support the position that freedom cannot be restricted based on past conviction of a crime. As someone on the right, one issue here is who is doing the restricting of freedom. One approach that strikes me as reasonable is requiring full disclosure, but the state then can't interfere in the relationship between a business and potential employee, aside from obvious exceptions like crimes of pedophilia and care of children. In between there can be issues where someone is put in a position of trust over other's lives, like, say, a bus driver. But this sort of meat ax approach ... no, I doubt it's going to find a lot of support on the right. Certainly not from myself.